All disabled people have the right to live independently and be included in the community (CRPD Article 19) and the right to personal mobility with greatest possible independence (Article 20). The Independent Living Movement transformed disability from a medical issue into a civil rights and community liberation issue. Disabled people rejected institutional control, built peer-led organizations, and demanded the right to live in the community with autonomy, dignity, and equal access. This page centers disabled-led organizing and includes major developments in the U.S., UK, Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific.
The Independent Living Movement is one of the most important foundations of modern disability rights. Its legacy includes Centers for Independent Living worldwide, peer-led disability services, activist networks like ADAPT, concepts of access, autonomy, self-direction, and cross-disability solidarity, legal frameworks guaranteeing community living, and expanded understanding of disability as identity and culture.
The movement's rallying cry: Nothing about us without us.
Between the late 1960s and 1980s, the Independent Living Movement:
The IL Movement emerged alongside the Civil Rights Movement, anti-Vietnam War organizing, feminist movements, LGBTQ+ liberation, and student activism.
Disabled activists drew from these movements' tactics: direct action, sit-ins and protests, legal challenges, coalition building, and community mutual aid.
Many early IL leaders were disabled students denied basic access to education, housing, and transportation.
At the University of California, Berkeley, disabled students—many of them wheelchair users—formed the Rolling Quads, a radical student organization demanding accessible housing, personal attendants, campus access reforms, and equal status as students, not patients.
The university initially placed disabled students in the campus hospital basement. The Rolling Quads fought for real campus inclusion.
Ed Roberts became widely recognized as the "father of Independent Living," though he insisted the movement was collective.
In 1972, Roberts and others founded the Berkeley Center for Independent Living, the world's first CIL.
This model spread nationwide and internationally.
Although stated differently across countries, IL is grounded in shared principles:
IL reframed disability as a social and political identity, not a medical problem to fix.
The IL Movement in the UK included the Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) in the 1970s, development of the Social Model of Disability, and expansion of personal assistance schemes.
UPIAS insisted that disability is created by social and environmental barriers, not by impairment.
Denmark, Sweden, and Norway developed early personal assistance programs, cooperative-run attendant services, and strong cross-disability coalitions.
Sweden's STIL (Stockholm Cooperative for Independent Living) became a global model.
Japan's IL Movement grew through disability liberation groups in the 1970s, protests against institutionalization, cross-disability coalitions led by psychiatric survivors, polio survivors, and others, and establishment of CILs beginning in the 1980s.
IL principles spread unevenly but powerfully:
The movement became part of larger global disability rights networks.
Key battles included protests at inaccessible buses, blocking intersections to demand lifts, and lawsuits requiring transit authorities to comply with access mandates.
In the U.S., groups like ADAPT (founded 1983) emerged from the IL ecosystem and used direct action to force transportation accessibility.
Early IL activists fought for accessible apartments, anti-discrimination protections, attendant services and personal assistance funding, and community-based housing as an alternative to institutions.
IL activism pushed universities, public buildings, libraries, and government agencies to adopt ramps, elevators, interpreters, braille signage, and disabled student services.
Many of these battles were won years before legal mandates existed.
IL activists played a crucial role in closing institutions and supporting people transitioning to the community.
They demanded community-based housing, personal assistance programs, peer support for institutional survivors, and legal protections for the right to live outside institutions.
These efforts helped shape key legal victories such as the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (U.S.), Section 504 regulations (1977), and later disability rights laws in the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, Brazil, and Japan.
Global movements later integrated these principles into the UN CRPD, especially Articles 19 (independent living) and 20 (mobility).
The IL Movement was diverse, but it also reproduced some inequities.
Understanding these tensions is essential for modern disability justice work.
IL reshaped global disability policy. Its legacies include Centers for Independent Living worldwide, peer-led disability services, activist networks like ADAPT, concepts of access, autonomy, self-direction, and cross-disability solidarity, legal frameworks guaranteeing community living, and expanded understanding of disability as identity and culture.
The movement remains alive today through disability justice organizing, mutual aid, and global CRPD advocacy.
This page centers disabled people's expertise and is informed by disabled-led organizing globally. For questions or to suggest additions, see How to Contribute.